August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008
India callingTrack the worldFeelingsAUTHOR'S DIARYBest Articles
 

Hi everyone!
I'm Sush Jaitly. This is my blog and believe you me
it's different. Read on and
Happy Blogging.
 

 
makeSplash.com by Sush JaitlyRSS Feed
Subscribe to my RSS feed See how?
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Add to My AOL Add to Technorati Favorites!
Feedburner(7820485)
 


Why is Wikileaks wrong?

December 8th, 2010

According to Wikileaks, Pak’s army is obsessed with India and Indian army. They know that conventionally they’re no match for us. And therefore they’re producing nukes and supporting terrorists. Saudi Arabia too is sponsoring terror groups operating in India. China is also indirectly helping Pak based terror groups and Narendra Modi was one of their targets after 26/11. Hillary Clinton thinks that we are ’self appointed front runners’ for UNSC seat and America does not know how to stop Pakistan from supporting terrorists. WOW! Fantastic! Can we all laugh now?

Tell me people, except for Hillary Clinton’s misplaced sense of awareness which revelation was a secret even before Julian Assange created a world wide uproar by uploading US cables and memos? If anyone is taken by surprise by these revelations it just reflects how poorly we actually read a situation, me included. If our intelligence agencies say that they did not know any of this, I can only pity them. For their information, I would even not be surprised if Chinese are also supplying arms and ammunition to these terrorists.

But let’s take a more pragmatic view of things. How do you expect any govt official or ambassador to react to any information that he may receive which needs to flow through him to his govt? Well, he’s supposed to add his free and frank opinion on the subject, keeping in mind the interests of his own country, and then forward it to his bosses. In all these cables that’s what these diplomats seem to have done. If they say that Sarkozy is surrounded by yes men, well then, that’s their reading of the situation. Similarly, if US commanders felt that British troops were ‘not upto the task of securing Helmand in Afghanistan’, that too is their reading of the way things were at that point of time at that place. What’s so wrong with that? Actually, whats wrong is that this should not have come out in the open. That’s what is wrong with all this.

Likewise, what do you expect our Indian ambassador to have written to our govt here in Delhi during the Lankan army’s onslaught on LTTE last year? I’m pretty much sure he would’ve said that Lankans were killing people in cold blood. What do you expect our Indian ambassador in Myanmar to have written about the recent elections held there? There’s little doubt about the fact that he’d have said that elections are completely rigged. Similarly, what about our ambassador to China? Wouldn’t he tell our govt that he doesn’t trust the Chinese govt one bit? Likewise, in Nepal too our ambassador would be giving feedbacks to our govt about their current impasse over choice of PM and direct links between Maoists in India and some prominent politicians of that country. I’m dead sure they would be doing all that and more. Thats their job. Thats what they’re paid for. Just imagine how embarrassing it would be for our country as a whole if all this were to come out in the open. And you can be rest assured that every country in this world has similar damning cables and internal memorandums which they cannot afford to be out in public domain. Just that that Assange has targeted only US for ‘attack’ or possibly has had access to only their cables, till now.

The world today has a very precariously balanced world order which has been been upset by the disclosure of these cables. International relations are built over decades and any breakthroughs achieved are a result of hard diplomatic parleys which these revelations have tried to undermine and destroy in a matter of a few hours. Take for instance the cable which says that Saudis want Americans to bomb Iran’s nuke facilities. Now, it was no real secret that Wahabi Saudi Arabia has no love lost for Shiite Iran but they would not say it in so many words for obvious reasons. But after this disclosure whatever little leeway Saudis had with Iran is gone. Take another revelation of certain Arab leaders trying to reach out to Israel. After this, in which direction do you think will this dialogue head towards? Only downwards, in case you were wondering.

Even the revelations about Pakistan do us no good. Do any of you feel that after this Americans will have any more leverage over Pakis? Absolutely not. If anything, it is the Pakis and terrorists who will be laughing at the predicament of Americans, that despite knowing everything America can do sweet f***all about it, and will get more emboldened in their nefarious designs. Sadly, our media has been downright stupid and immature to have neither thought nor debated this through. For them, Pakistan’s involvement in terror activities is still BREAKING NEWS.

Yes, the truth must prevail, but it must not be revealed, at least in diplomacy and in military operations. That’s because the world does and should go by officially stated positions of various govts, be it the issue of Iran’s nukes or America’s fight against terror. Pertinent to mention that diplomats try to maintain a world order, as they perceive it, by having such conversations with each other, which are a major factor in arriving at the officially stated positions of various countries. And therefore, what goes on behind the scenes as shown in these cables should not matter at all. How does it matter what internal wranglings of these diplomats and officials have been to arrive at those decisions? How does it matter that Hillary Clinton does not really support India for a permanent seat at the UN as long as the official position of US is to the contrary? Just that that I may now think twice before ordering the Clinton platter at Bukhara restaurant in Taj in Delhi, if and when I have the money to do it.

To those who are scoffed at the idea of Americans spying on UN officials, all I’d say is that Americans may be justified in doing so. Just as Indians would be justified in snooping on UN officials deployed in the valley to see what kind of report do these people send to UN, especially in situations like the stone pelting protests in which a hundred or so civilians were killed. Though I’m not really aware whether our agencies are doing it or not but they’d be perfectly justified in doing so, if and when they do it. At the same time India cannot afford to let this come out in the open either. All such actions taken to further your national interests are justified. And they’re not just governed by ethics alone. If it was only ethics which mattered we should’ve attacked Sri Lanka for killing so many innocent Tamils in 2009 but we didn’t because it was not in our interest, at that point of time. Who knows, had it been before Indira Gandhi was killed, may be we would’ve, for good or for worse.

All these leaked papers, coming as it does from a self professed hacker who comes from a broken home and who has had no formal education in life, goes to show how a good environment at home in early years along with proper education hold you in good stead all through your life. They make you a good law abiding citizen of your country and the world who knows what his actions will lead to. Otherwise how would Julian Assange explain publication of social security numbers of American soldiers, technical details of an American device which prevents bombs from going off and list of websites and installations which are vital for America, not to mention his threat of giving out technical details of a thermo nuclear bomb? Al Qaeda would pay thousands of dollars for such information which he has given for free.

All this makes me doubtful about the whole aim of this exercise which seems to be to not just embarrass America but compromise it. On top of it he’s asking for donations to keep on doing this. An American official was so right in saying that if all this is not against the law, the law needs to be changed. In my opinion Assange has not done this for any good of this world but was used by certain vested interests to embarrass America. One person alone would really not have the resources to get access to confidential information and take on the entire might of US.

Lastly, I wonder how many of you think that these revelations have done any good to the world in general. Apart from having a good laugh at the expense of Americans it is only the bad guys who would benefit from Wikileaks. No one else. Do give this issue a thought before you guys make up your mind whether these revelations come within the purview of freedom of speech or have in fact only harmed us in more ways than one.

Before I sign off for today a word about Barrack Obama. Though I’ve not really been the biggest fan of American policies in the past my heart still goes out to him. With two wars, a lousy economy and not so bright future prospects, these revelations couldn’t have come at a worst possible time. It appears that he’ll keep on paying for the wrongs of Bush(s) and Clintons. No other US President has had such a bad deal in recent times. Oh by the way, if Sarah Palin is reading this- she shouldn’t have bothered. I know she would ‘refudiate’ all of this.

Related Post

Defining Indo-US partnership

Outsourcing: PAIN is coming, for Americans?

Ground Zero mosque: 7 reality checks

Add to Technorati Favorites submit to reddit

27 Responses to “Why is Wikileaks wrong?”

  1. 1
    Twitter Trackbacks for Why is Wikileaks wrong? « makeSplash.com by Sush Jaitly [makesplash.com] on Topsy.com:

    [...] Why is Wikileaks wrong? « makeSplash.com by Sush Jaitly makesplash.com/why-is-wikileaks-wrong/ – view page – cached December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008... Read moreDecember 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 India callingTrack the worldFeelingsAUTHOR'S DIARYBest Articles View page Tweets about this link [...]





    Comment on this Comment
  2. 2
    Enfant Terrible:

    Pure Gyan. Most of us do not understand the nuances of diplomacy. For us it seems like Assange is the simpleton who is being persecuted for crimes he did not do. But may be you have a point.





    Comment on this Comment
  3. 3
    Deven:

    Nonsense. I dont believe you. US is imperialist power out to impose its will on rest of us. Wikileaks is welcome. Assange has been framed.





    Comment on this Comment
  4. 4
    ser:

    We NEED proper steering mechanism to survive the global society we created with technology. Transparancy/involvism is needed. It's urgend, at this moment our society has an obsolete 200 years old steering mechanism. How can a few wise leaders understand these complex global issues pending ?

    Would we have gone to Iraq over Weapons of mass destruction is we were part of the diplomatic cable discussion ?
    Better of with more transparency ? Credit Crises / Cable gate shows governments are not so much in control of the global society. Wasn't it work of the press to tell us the truth ?

    At least the cork out of the bottle. Fact is that secrets are harder to keep anno 2010. Shutting down is naive. Discuss it is the only option.. If democracy fails, the only solution is MORE democracy!. Fill the streets and discuss where the press fails.





    Comment on this Comment
  5. 5
    Grady Burr:

    Obama's capitulation on the tax cuts is a craven, inexcusable, pathetic act of political cowardice that legitimizes all the left-wing whining about him that generally has been, until this point, unmerited.





    Comment on this Comment
  6. 6
    resentful indian:

    isn't the whole thing fabricated by the US and being leaked the way the US wants?!!! looks like they are on the path of some well worked out plan... master plan!!!





    Comment on this Comment
  7. 7
    Bhagwad Jal Park:

    I like governments to be afraid that their secrets can be leaked at any time. They might choose to not do dirty things in secret next time.

    All government abuse power. People in a democracy must never trust their government too much or give it too much power. It's one of the reasons why I'm against the UID project.

    The power to keep things secret is misused. After all, the government is our servant. Will a servant have secrets from his/her master? Let the government try and keep things secret. But it shouldn't cry when those secrets come out.

    Governments all over the world keep telling us when they listen to our conversations and spy on our email: "If you have nothing to fear, then why hide?." That logic is wrong. But it applies perfectly to the government itself because the government has no business keeping things secret from the people who are its master.





    Comment on this Comment
  8. 8
    Humsafer:

    Assange is being seen as a layman who has taken on a big country like US and everybody loves to see US getting embarrassed. If you really ask me why not? They are paying for decades of arrogant diplomacy and have imposed war on so many countries. SO why not? Its so good to see a layman making people like Hillary Clinton apologize and stuff.
    We all love sensationalism. You only had tweeted this. Give them hell.





    Comment on this Comment
  9. 9
    Wikileaks Supporter:

    Hi, you should check out http://www.voteonwikileaks.com. It's sort of like a crowdsourced collection of arguments against Wikileaks. Considering you're a blogger, i think you'd find it to be an interesting read





    Comment on this Comment
  10. 10
    Gwen Balicdem:

    You guys think Assange will come with more exciting news? Or is the lawsuit against him all he can handle at this time? G.





    Comment on this Comment
  11. 11
    Shaan:

    Is Julian Asange not a single man? Is there a state behind him? Is it Iran? or China or Russia? Who cares? The leak has helped people to get a rough understanding of the way American diplomats work. The leak is not that much worthy of being such a sensation except for the fact that the leak happened. But still the leak has helped us understand how much lethargic the Americans were even after the Indian equivalent of 9/11, the Mumbai attacks. In one cable the Americans accuse the British of overreacting when the British want to put pressure on Pakistan to act fast. The American arguments against the leak of the cables is laughable because the cables were legally accessible to 3 million persons through the US Army network. Is something that is accessible to 3 million a secret?





    Comment on this Comment
  12. 12
    Sush:

    @Shaan, there is little doubt that people the world over have now been made aware of American doublespeak because of these cables. But I would be surprised if our govt was not aware of American lackadaisical approach.
    Also, I'd like to add that may be not a state but there are definitely some strong corporates who support Assange.





    Comment on this Comment
  13. 13
    Zenia Phair:

    Those who expose secrets are far more hated than those in power who commit heinous acts using secrecy as their principal weapon.





    Comment on this Comment
  14. 14
    Karena Bordinger:

    Good on Julian Assange - no-one else has exposed as much deceit.





    Comment on this Comment
  15. 15
    Jan Hedgepath:

    When certain section of our government and military are as backwards as we see in WikiLeaks - then I personally have NO issue with that being made public. If you don't want dodgy actions to be brought to the public's attention, then do not do them in the first place.





    Comment on this Comment
  16. 16
    Jhonsonfur:

    you people are utter dipshíts





    Comment on this Comment
  17. 17
    Jan's Desktop Wallpapers:

    You know what, I never thought of it that way. Makes plenty of sense now. Thanks for explaining it so clearly, it really helped me and I'm sure it will help plenty of other people too. All the best!





    Comment on this Comment
  18. 18
    Terence Dowell:

    I together with my buddies have already been reading through the excellent hints from your web page and so then developed an awful feeling I had not expressed respect to the web blog owner for them. Most of the women appeared to be certainly passionate to learn all of them and have in effect certainly been taking advantage of these things. Appreciation for getting well accommodating as well as for picking out this kind of decent issues most people are really desirous to discover. My personal honest regret for not expressing gratitude to you earlier.





    Comment on this Comment
  19. 19
    Cataweb Online:

    Wikileak demonstrates the power of online media as a tool for social and political reform. Freedom of information advocates should remain fearless and resolute should they want to succeed in publicizing confidential data to bring more transparency in governments.





    Comment on this Comment
  20. 20
    Low Testosterone Symptoms:

    Today, thanks to the internet, stories of Nibirus return has spread faster than the Black Plague. Today, people have nicknamed it Planet X or the Tenth Planet. Every time an anomolous body is spotted in space, fanatics shout out Nibiru ! and begin claims of a NASA coverup. Personal theories on the internet are based upon previous theories and so on until now when we have a complete biography of the Niberians and their life on Earth! Of course, no-one ever bothers to check out the validity of previous theories. That would require effort. So they are just assumed to be fact. Much in the same way that so many are lured into believing that Mars will look as large as the Moon each August.





    Comment on this Comment
  21. 21
    wszystko po 5 złotych:

    I adore your wp design, where would you obtain it through? wszystko po 5 złotych http://auto-service-lodz.pl/torby-torebki/





    Comment on this Comment
  22. 22
    free bet baskets:

    Hello! This post could not be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my previous room mate! He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this write-up to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!





    Comment on this Comment
  23. 23
    Alissa:

    Hi my family member! I wish to say that this post is amazing,
    great written and come with almost all vital infos. I would like to peer extra posts like this .


    my page: search engine optimization; Alissa,





    Comment on this Comment
  24. 24
    home click:

    Hey very nice site!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your web site and take
    the feeds additionally? I'm satisfied to search out so many helpful info right here in the publish, we need work out more strategies on this
    regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .





    Comment on this Comment
  25. 25
    codes and coupons love scent:

    Admiring the dedication you put into your website and detailed information you present.
    It's great to come across a blog every once in a while that isn't the same
    out of date rehashed material. Great read! I've saved your site and I'm including your RSS feeds to my Google account.





    Comment on this Comment
  26. 26
    lumens online coupon:

    This article provides clear idea designed for the new viewers of blogging, that genuinely how to do blogging and site-building.





    Comment on this Comment
  27. 27
    royal design coupn codes:

    Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your
    web site and in accession capital to say that
    I get actually loved account your blog posts.
    Anyway I'll be subscribing in your augment and even
    I achievement you get right of entry to constantly rapidly.





    Comment on this Comment

Leave a Reply

TOP POST

    You don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that such large outpourings of support for Anna Hazare is basically a demand for a phone number, viz 101, which they can call up to register their complaint against neighborhood pandu havaldaar or the municipality clerk who ask for money to do their legitimate jobs. They want a number which is accessible to each and every one so that action is taken against offenders based on their complaint. Though everyone has heard of 2G scam, CWG scam, Adarsh scam etc etc (list is too long for this write up), yet they do not really associate much with it because most of these scams talk about astronomical amounts of money which they cannot relate with. They may have heard of 1.76 lakh crores which was lost in 2G scam but they relate more to that thousand bucks which goes out of their own pockets to corrupt babus and policemen. And if Congress cannot see this basic simple all pervasive demand all I can say is that they're downright stupid and naive. .....

    August 22 2011     Read More [8]...

Copyright © 2014 Makesplash - All Rights Reserved